Oblivion talk:Sigrid

Shop hoursEdit

I have changed her "service hours" to 7 AM to 5 PM from 7PM to 5PM because...that just didn't make sense. However if this is really true (and I don't think it is, from my experience) please revert the edit. Thanks! --CharmSpell 20:34, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

The same question came up at Oblivion Talk:Mariana Ancharia. The original hours were correct, just badly worded, since most of this info was written by a script. I've revised the wording. --Nephele^Talk 22:16, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

Selling goodsEdit

I have seen, while playing oblivion, that Sigrid also is selling one (1) Novice Pestle and Mortar shouldn't that be shown on the page? and shall it then be written as: one (1) Novice Pestle and Mortar or as one (1) Novice Apparatus? -Goblin lair 10:13, 14 August 2008

The page already shows her as selling Apparatus. –Rpeh^{•T•C•E•} 07:33, 14 August 2008 (EDT)

Does it?... But on selling it is only typed: Potions. Or does the Bying Apparatus counts as selling Apparatus? -Goblin lair 14:23, 14 August 2008

wait!.... it did...  :| ... sorry, i didn't see it at the time back in August, but... now I saw it so... well...

the page seems to be fine... Goblin lair 22:26, 11 September 2008

Glitch?Edit

For some reason, this wild woman starts face-punching my horse as I arrive in Kvatch camp.— Unsigned comment by Pytak (talk • contribs) on 14 October 2008, 12:45

Did you do something to anger the Mages Guild or did you do something to her beforehand which would cause this behavior?--penguin0719 15:06, 14 October 2008 (EDT)

Services HoursEdit

Odd one this... Krusty changed her availability to exclude the time when she's asleep. In the CS, she should offer services during that time but, one quick in-game check later, she doesn't. I wonder if this affects many other service providers? –Rpeh^{•T•C•E•} 13:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

This oddity made me a bit nervous, so I just double-checked each and every one of our "checked" NPCs in-game - and with the exception of a small mistake on Agata's servicebox, the whole bunch is in excellent condition and all times are correct. But in the future, we should probably be very suspicious when we bump into NPCs that offers services in their sleep - and maybe even put a note on the project page? Krusty 20:06, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

(discussion continues on UESPWiki talk:Oblivion NPC Redesign Project/Archive 2#Night_Traders) –Rpeh^{•T•C•E•} 20:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Dead?Edit

Upon my arrival to Kvatch for the first time I found this NPC dead in her bedroll, with her head clipped through and stuck in the tent. Has anyone else ever had this happen? Mole126 15:37, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

only survivor?Edit

hi i was wondering why the page says that she's the only survivor?--GUM!!! 00:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

If you read the sentence before it, it explains that she's the only survivor of the Kvatch mages guild.--Arch-Mage Matt^Talk 00:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

It does seem a bit misleading. I'll change the wording to make it clearer, if no one has any objections. -DevotedInsanity 00:39, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

It was clear to me, anything more may sound a bit redundant.--Arch-Mage Matt^Talk 00:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Oops, I already changed it. Should I change it back? -DevotedInsanity 00:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

no i think it's better this way!(you guys have cut my comment off 4 times man i hate it when this happens!)--GUM!!! 00:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

(Gum you should see when trying to discuss a heated argument on the Admin Noticeboard) I made it a bit less redundant.--Arch-Mage Matt^Talk 00:47, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

ok it's perfect now!(sounds scary!)--GUM!!! 00:51, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

"Now [sic] you've closed the gate"?Edit

I'm going to remove the Sic template from this page because "now you've closed the gate" isn't ungrammatical. If there's something else going on (like a mismatch between ingame text and voice-acted speech) then please mention it here for future reference when reverting. 94.13.155.178 17:32, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Could be a missing 'that', [EDIT] The Silencer 17:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC) did you not see the missing text highlighted when removing the tag.The Silencer 17:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Usually the tag is needed for misspellings and the like. In this case (if you look at the page history), it looks like it's because some people felt a "that" should be there. I suppose the tag itself is not a big deal--it's really just meant to stop people from changing the text. –Eshe^talk 17:52, 27 March 2012 (UTC)